On Management Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

On Management - Essay ExampleIt is always easier to come up with business goals than actually establishing and executing the required strategies to strive these objectives. Being a manager is not just being able to show profits at the end of the year but being in charge of the critical daily business processes to work for it.Good management is indispensable to the success of each organization. The failure or success of any business institution lies in the hand of its management team as they lay the companys long term direction, go competitively effective strategic moves and business approaches and implements what selects to be done internally to produce day in and day out strategy slaying (Strickland, 4). Put simply, the manager is the major driving force that directs the organization to its expected end.In school, we are taught that manager has four primary functions-planning which refers to identifying the goals, objectives, and the business plans to achieve them organizing whi ch identifies and sets the infallible resources to execute the business plan directing which includes pointing, leading, and managing employees to achieve organizational goals and controlling which involves the evaluation process carried out by the organization to check if the actual surgical procedure of the company matches the devised business plan (Allen 2). I believe that these functions are significant in the achievement of business goals. However, all these functions are too broad to establish together, so this paper will only tackle the leadership function of management.Leadership is a critical and rigorous process of influencing and motivating people to achieve business goals. Though the goal of each leader is essentially the same, they craft different ways to achieve them by employing unique management and leadership styles which a good deal leads to conflict as to whether what leadership technique is superior. Two leadership styles are often utilized in business operat ions-authoritarian and participative management.Authoritarian organizations follow the military fount of organization where decision making is centralized and lies at the hand of the top management. Middle managers do as they are ordered, following the chain of command employ by their superior. Authoritarian organization essentially operates a top-down management style, where the primary role of managers is to transmit orders. Also, authoritarian organizations view that workers hate work and that they need to be compelled to the task demanded from them. This implies that the achievement of the companys goals can only be achieved through force. Authoritarian managers do not motivate their employees to perform well in their job. Their chief(prenominal) concern is the achievement of a certain goal at the expense of their employees. (Role of Managers under Different Management Styles 38-51)In a participative management style, works are delegated to the employees and managers largely coordinate with the group work. Also, responsibilities are accepted and performed by the employees knowing they will be held accountable for the quality of their work. Work is viewed as a source of satisfaction or frustration depending on the managers and organizations chosen style of leadership. People who derive satisfaction from their job will then perform the trump way that they can while those who obtain frustration from it will tend to perform badly. Thus, managers highly motivate their em